The lightweight `DELETE` statement removes rows from the table `[db.]table` that match the expression `expr`. It is only available for the *MergeTree table engine family.
It is called "lightweight `DELETE`" to contrast it to the [ALTER table DELETE](/en/sql-reference/statements/alter/delete) command, which is a heavyweight process.
## Lightweight `DELETE` does not delete data from storage immediately
With lightweight `DELETE`, deleted rows are internally marked as deleted immediately and will be automatically filtered out of all subsequent queries. However, cleanup of data happens during the next merge. As a result, it is possible that for an unspecified period, data is not actually deleted from storage and is only marked as deleted.
If you need to guarantee that your data is deleted from storage in a predictable time, consider using the [ALTER table DELETE](/en/sql-reference/statements/alter/delete) command. Note that deleting data using `ALTER table DELETE` may consume significant resources as it recreates all affected parts.
Large deletes can negatively affect ClickHouse performance. If you are attempting to delete all rows from a table, consider using the [`TRUNCATE TABLE`](/en/sql-reference/statements/truncate) command.
If you anticipate frequent deletes, consider using a [custom partitioning key](/en/engines/table-engines/mergetree-family/custom-partitioning-key). You can then use the [`ALTER TABLE...DROP PARTITION`](/en/sql-reference/statements/alter/partition#drop-partitionpart) command to quickly drop all rows associated with that partition.
By default, `DELETE` does not work for tables with projections. This is because rows in a projection may be affected by a `DELETE` operation. But there is a [MergeTree setting](https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/operations/settings/merge-tree-settings) `lightweight_mutation_projection_mode` can change the behavior.
## Performance considerations when using lightweight `DELETE`
**Deleting large volumes of data with the lightweight `DELETE` statement can negatively affect SELECT query performance.**
The following can also negatively impact lightweight `DELETE` performance:
- A heavy `WHERE` condition in a `DELETE` query.
- If the mutations queue is filled with many other mutations, this can possibly lead to performance issues as all mutations on a table are executed sequentially.
- The affected table having a very large number of data parts.
- Having a lot of data in compact parts. In a Compact part, all columns are stored in one file.
When a `DELETE FROM table ...` query is executed, ClickHouse saves a mask where each row is marked as either “existing” or as “deleted”. Those “deleted” rows are omitted for subsequent queries. However, rows are actually only removed later by subsequent merges. Writing this mask is much more lightweight than what is done by an `ALTER table DELETE` query.
The mask is implemented as a hidden `_row_exists` system column that stores `True` for all visible rows and `False` for deleted ones. This column is only present in a part if some rows in the part were deleted. This column does not exist when a part has all values equal to `True`.
When a masked column is used in a query, the `SELECT ... FROM table WHERE condition` query internally is extended by the predicate on `_row_exists` and is transformed to:
At execution time, the column `_row_exists` is read to determine which rows should not be returned. If there are many deleted rows, ClickHouse can determine which granules can be fully skipped when reading the rest of the columns.
3.`DELETE` queries are transformed to `ALTER table UPDATE` queries
The `DELETE FROM table WHERE condition` is translated into an `ALTER table UPDATE _row_exists = 0 WHERE condition` mutation.
Internally, this mutation is executed in two steps:
1. A `SELECT count() FROM table WHERE condition` command is executed for each individual part to determine if the part is affected.
2. Based on the commands above, affected parts are then mutated, and hardlinks are created for unaffected parts. In the case of wide parts, the `_row_exists` column for each row is updated and all other columns' files are hardlinked. For compact parts, all columns are re-written because they are all stored together in one file.
From the steps above, we can see that lightweight deletes using the masking technique improves performance over traditional `ALTER table DELETE` commands because `ALTER table DELETE` reads and re-writes all the columns' files for affected parts.