ClickHouse/docs/en/sql-reference/statements/select/order-by.md

404 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
toc_title: ORDER BY
---
# ORDER BY Clause {#select-order-by}
The `ORDER BY` clause contains a list of expressions, which can each be attributed with `DESC` (descending) or `ASC` (ascending) modifier which determine the sorting direction. If the direction is not specified, `ASC` is assumed, so its usually omitted. The sorting direction applies to a single expression, not to the entire list. Example: `ORDER BY Visits DESC, SearchPhrase`
Rows that have identical values for the list of sorting expressions are output in an arbitrary order, which can also be non-deterministic (different each time).
If the ORDER BY clause is omitted, the order of the rows is also undefined, and may be non-deterministic as well.
## Sorting of Special Values {#sorting-of-special-values}
There are two approaches to `NaN` and `NULL` sorting order:
- By default or with the `NULLS LAST` modifier: first the values, then `NaN`, then `NULL`.
- With the `NULLS FIRST` modifier: first `NULL`, then `NaN`, then other values.
### Example {#example}
For the table
``` text
┌─x─┬────y─┐
│ 1 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 2 │ 2 │
│ 1 │ nan │
│ 2 │ 2 │
│ 3 │ 4 │
│ 5 │ 6 │
│ 6 │ nan │
│ 7 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 6 │ 7 │
│ 8 │ 9 │
└───┴──────┘
```
Run the query `SELECT * FROM t_null_nan ORDER BY y NULLS FIRST` to get:
``` text
┌─x─┬────y─┐
│ 1 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 7 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 1 │ nan │
│ 6 │ nan │
│ 2 │ 2 │
│ 2 │ 2 │
│ 3 │ 4 │
│ 5 │ 6 │
│ 6 │ 7 │
│ 8 │ 9 │
└───┴──────┘
```
When floating point numbers are sorted, NaNs are separate from the other values. Regardless of the sorting order, NaNs come at the end. In other words, for ascending sorting they are placed as if they are larger than all the other numbers, while for descending sorting they are placed as if they are smaller than the rest.
## Collation Support {#collation-support}
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
For sorting by [String](../../../sql-reference/data-types/string.md) values, you can specify collation (comparison). Example: `ORDER BY SearchPhrase COLLATE 'tr'` - for sorting by keyword in ascending order, using the Turkish alphabet, case insensitive, assuming that strings are UTF-8 encoded. `COLLATE` can be specified or not for each expression in ORDER BY independently. If `ASC` or `DESC` is specified, `COLLATE` is specified after it. When using `COLLATE`, sorting is always case-insensitive.
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
Collate is supported in [LowCardinality](../../../sql-reference/data-types/lowcardinality.md), [Nullable](../../../sql-reference/data-types/nullable.md), [Array](../../../sql-reference/data-types/array.md) and [Tuple](../../../sql-reference/data-types/tuple.md).
We only recommend using `COLLATE` for final sorting of a small number of rows, since sorting with `COLLATE` is less efficient than normal sorting by bytes.
2020-12-12 03:39:22 +00:00
## Collation Examples {#collation-examples}
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
Example only with [String](../../../sql-reference/data-types/string.md) values:
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
Input table:
``` text
┌─x─┬─s────┐
│ 1 │ bca │
│ 2 │ ABC │
│ 3 │ 123a │
│ 4 │ abc │
│ 5 │ BCA │
└───┴──────┘
```
Query:
```sql
SELECT * FROM collate_test ORDER BY s ASC COLLATE 'en';
```
Result:
``` text
┌─x─┬─s────┐
│ 3 │ 123a │
│ 4 │ abc │
│ 2 │ ABC │
│ 1 │ bca │
│ 5 │ BCA │
└───┴──────┘
```
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
Example with [Nullable](../../../sql-reference/data-types/nullable.md):
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
Input table:
2020-12-08 01:55:57 +00:00
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
``` text
┌─x─┬─s────┐
│ 1 │ bca │
│ 2 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 3 │ ABC │
│ 4 │ 123a │
│ 5 │ abc │
│ 6 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 7 │ BCA │
└───┴──────┘
```
Query:
```sql
SELECT * FROM collate_test ORDER BY s ASC COLLATE 'en';
```
Result:
2020-12-12 00:39:45 +00:00
``` text
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
┌─x─┬─s────┐
│ 4 │ 123a │
│ 5 │ abc │
│ 3 │ ABC │
│ 1 │ bca │
│ 7 │ BCA │
│ 6 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
│ 2 │ ᴺᵁᴸᴸ │
└───┴──────┘
```
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
Example with [Array](../../../sql-reference/data-types/array.md):
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
Input table:
``` text
┌─x─┬─s─────────────┐
│ 1 │ ['Z'] │
│ 2 │ ['z'] │
│ 3 │ ['a'] │
│ 4 │ ['A'] │
│ 5 │ ['z','a'] │
│ 6 │ ['z','a','a'] │
│ 7 │ [''] │
└───┴───────────────┘
```
Query:
```sql
SELECT * FROM collate_test ORDER BY s ASC COLLATE 'en';
```
Result:
``` text
┌─x─┬─s─────────────┐
│ 7 │ [''] │
│ 3 │ ['a'] │
│ 4 │ ['A'] │
│ 2 │ ['z'] │
│ 5 │ ['z','a'] │
│ 6 │ ['z','a','a'] │
│ 1 │ ['Z'] │
└───┴───────────────┘
```
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
Example with [LowCardinality](../../../sql-reference/data-types/lowcardinality.md) string:
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
Input table:
```text
┌─x─┬─s───┐
│ 1 │ Z │
│ 2 │ z │
│ 3 │ a │
│ 4 │ A │
│ 5 │ za │
│ 6 │ zaa │
│ 7 │ │
└───┴─────┘
```
Query:
```sql
SELECT * FROM collate_test ORDER BY s ASC COLLATE 'en';
```
Result:
```text
┌─x─┬─s───┐
│ 7 │ │
│ 3 │ a │
│ 4 │ A │
│ 2 │ z │
│ 1 │ Z │
│ 5 │ za │
│ 6 │ zaa │
└───┴─────┘
```
2020-12-12 02:48:23 +00:00
Example with [Tuple](../../../sql-reference/data-types/tuple.md):
2020-12-08 00:51:41 +00:00
```text
┌─x─┬─s───────┐
│ 1 │ (1,'Z') │
│ 2 │ (1,'z') │
│ 3 │ (1,'a') │
│ 4 │ (2,'z') │
│ 5 │ (1,'A') │
│ 6 │ (2,'Z') │
│ 7 │ (2,'A') │
└───┴─────────┘
```
Query:
```sql
SELECT * FROM collate_test ORDER BY s ASC COLLATE 'en';
```
Result:
```text
┌─x─┬─s───────┐
│ 3 │ (1,'a') │
│ 5 │ (1,'A') │
│ 2 │ (1,'z') │
│ 1 │ (1,'Z') │
│ 7 │ (2,'A') │
│ 4 │ (2,'z') │
│ 6 │ (2,'Z') │
└───┴─────────┘
```
## Implementation Details {#implementation-details}
Less RAM is used if a small enough [LIMIT](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/limit.md) is specified in addition to `ORDER BY`. Otherwise, the amount of memory spent is proportional to the volume of data for sorting. For distributed query processing, if [GROUP BY](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/group-by.md) is omitted, sorting is partially done on remote servers, and the results are merged on the requestor server. This means that for distributed sorting, the volume of data to sort can be greater than the amount of memory on a single server.
If there is not enough RAM, it is possible to perform sorting in external memory (creating temporary files on a disk). Use the setting `max_bytes_before_external_sort` for this purpose. If it is set to 0 (the default), external sorting is disabled. If it is enabled, when the volume of data to sort reaches the specified number of bytes, the collected data is sorted and dumped into a temporary file. After all data is read, all the sorted files are merged and the results are output. Files are written to the `/var/lib/clickhouse/tmp/` directory in the config (by default, but you can use the `tmp_path` parameter to change this setting).
Running a query may use more memory than `max_bytes_before_external_sort`. For this reason, this setting must have a value significantly smaller than `max_memory_usage`. As an example, if your server has 128 GB of RAM and you need to run a single query, set `max_memory_usage` to 100 GB, and `max_bytes_before_external_sort` to 80 GB.
External sorting works much less effectively than sorting in RAM.
## Optimization of Data Reading {#optimize_read_in_order}
2021-07-29 15:27:50 +00:00
If `ORDER BY` expression has a prefix that coincides with the table sorting key, you can optimize the query by using the [optimize_read_in_order](../../../operations/settings/settings.md#optimize_read_in_order) setting.
2021-07-29 15:20:55 +00:00
2021-05-27 19:49:41 +00:00
When the `optimize_read_in_order` setting is enabled, the ClickHouse server uses the table index and reads the data in order of the `ORDER BY` key. This allows to avoid reading all data in case of specified [LIMIT](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/limit.md). So queries on big data with small limit are processed faster.
2021-05-27 19:44:11 +00:00
Optimization works with both `ASC` and `DESC` and does not work together with [GROUP BY](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/group-by.md) clause and [FINAL](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/from.md#select-from-final) modifier.
2021-05-27 19:49:41 +00:00
When the `optimize_read_in_order` setting is disabled, the ClickHouse server does not use the table index while processing `SELECT` queries.
Consider disabling `optimize_read_in_order` manually, when running queries that have `ORDER BY` clause, large `LIMIT` and [WHERE](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/where.md) condition that requires to read huge amount of records before queried data is found.
Optimization is supported in the following table engines:
- [MergeTree](../../../engines/table-engines/mergetree-family/mergetree.md)
- [Merge](../../../engines/table-engines/special/merge.md), [Buffer](../../../engines/table-engines/special/buffer.md), and [MaterializedView](../../../engines/table-engines/special/materializedview.md) table engines over `MergeTree`-engine tables
2021-05-27 19:44:11 +00:00
In `MaterializedView`-engine tables the optimization works with views like `SELECT ... FROM merge_tree_table ORDER BY pk`. But it is not supported in the queries like `SELECT ... FROM view ORDER BY pk` if the view query does not have the `ORDER BY` clause.
## ORDER BY Expr WITH FILL Modifier {#orderby-with-fill}
This modifier also can be combined with [LIMIT … WITH TIES modifier](../../../sql-reference/statements/select/limit.md#limit-with-ties).
`WITH FILL` modifier can be set after `ORDER BY expr` with optional `FROM expr`, `TO expr` and `STEP expr` parameters.
All missed values of `expr` column will be filled sequentially and other columns will be filled as defaults.
To fill multiple columns, add `WITH FILL` modifier with optional parameters after each field name in `ORDER BY` section.
``` sql
ORDER BY expr [WITH FILL] [FROM const_expr] [TO const_expr] [STEP const_numeric_expr], ... exprN [WITH FILL] [FROM expr] [TO expr] [STEP numeric_expr]
```
`WITH FILL` can be applied for fields with Numeric (all kinds of float, decimal, int) or Date/DateTime types. When applied for `String` fields, missed values are filled with empty strings.
When `FROM const_expr` not defined sequence of filling use minimal `expr` field value from `ORDER BY`.
When `TO const_expr` not defined sequence of filling use maximum `expr` field value from `ORDER BY`.
When `STEP const_numeric_expr` defined then `const_numeric_expr` interprets `as is` for numeric types as `days` for Date type and as `seconds` for DateTime type.
When `STEP const_numeric_expr` omitted then sequence of filling use `1.0` for numeric type, `1 day` for Date type and `1 second` for DateTime type.
Example of a query without `WITH FILL`:
``` sql
SELECT n, source FROM (
SELECT toFloat32(number % 10) AS n, 'original' AS source
FROM numbers(10) WHERE number % 3 = 1
) ORDER BY n;
```
Result:
``` text
┌─n─┬─source───┐
│ 1 │ original │
│ 4 │ original │
│ 7 │ original │
└───┴──────────┘
```
Same query after applying `WITH FILL` modifier:
``` sql
SELECT n, source FROM (
SELECT toFloat32(number % 10) AS n, 'original' AS source
FROM numbers(10) WHERE number % 3 = 1
) ORDER BY n WITH FILL FROM 0 TO 5.51 STEP 0.5;
```
Result:
``` text
┌───n─┬─source───┐
│ 0 │ │
│ 0.5 │ │
│ 1 │ original │
│ 1.5 │ │
│ 2 │ │
│ 2.5 │ │
│ 3 │ │
│ 3.5 │ │
│ 4 │ original │
│ 4.5 │ │
│ 5 │ │
│ 5.5 │ │
│ 7 │ original │
└─────┴──────────┘
```
For the case with multiple fields `ORDER BY field2 WITH FILL, field1 WITH FILL` order of filling will follow the order of fields in the `ORDER BY` clause.
Example:
``` sql
SELECT
toDate((number * 10) * 86400) AS d1,
toDate(number * 86400) AS d2,
'original' AS source
FROM numbers(10)
WHERE (number % 3) = 1
ORDER BY
d2 WITH FILL,
d1 WITH FILL STEP 5;
```
Result:
``` text
┌───d1───────┬───d2───────┬─source───┐
│ 1970-01-11 │ 1970-01-02 │ original │
2020-08-01 22:02:46 +00:00
│ 1970-01-01 │ 1970-01-03 │ │
│ 1970-01-01 │ 1970-01-04 │ │
│ 1970-02-10 │ 1970-01-05 │ original │
2020-08-01 22:02:46 +00:00
│ 1970-01-01 │ 1970-01-06 │ │
│ 1970-01-01 │ 1970-01-07 │ │
│ 1970-03-12 │ 1970-01-08 │ original │
└────────────┴────────────┴──────────┘
```
Field `d1` does not fill in and use the default value cause we do not have repeated values for `d2` value, and the sequence for `d1` cant be properly calculated.
The following query with the changed field in `ORDER BY`:
``` sql
SELECT
toDate((number * 10) * 86400) AS d1,
toDate(number * 86400) AS d2,
'original' AS source
FROM numbers(10)
WHERE (number % 3) = 1
ORDER BY
d1 WITH FILL STEP 5,
d2 WITH FILL;
```
Result:
``` text
┌───d1───────┬───d2───────┬─source───┐
│ 1970-01-11 │ 1970-01-02 │ original │
2020-08-01 22:02:46 +00:00
│ 1970-01-16 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-01-21 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-01-26 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-01-31 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-02-05 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-02-10 │ 1970-01-05 │ original │
2020-08-01 22:02:46 +00:00
│ 1970-02-15 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-02-20 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-02-25 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-03-02 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-03-07 │ 1970-01-01 │ │
│ 1970-03-12 │ 1970-01-08 │ original │
└────────────┴────────────┴──────────┘
```
[Original article](https://clickhouse.tech/docs/en/sql-reference/statements/select/order-by/) <!--hide-->