Merge pull request #24457 from nikitamikhaylov/thread-pool-deadlock

Try to fix deadlock in ThreadPool

src/Common/ThreadPool.cpp

@@ -113,12 +113,22 @@ ReturnType ThreadPoolImpl<Thread>::scheduleImpl(Job job, int priority, std::opti
         if (shutdown)
             return on_error();
 
-        jobs.emplace(std::move(job), priority);
+        /// We must not to allocate any memory after we emplaced a job in a queue.
-        ++scheduled_jobs;
+        /// Because if an exception would be thrown, we won't notify a thread about job occurrence.
 
-        if (threads.size() < std::min(max_threads, scheduled_jobs))
+        /// Check if there are enough threads to process job.
+        if (threads.size() < std::min(max_threads, scheduled_jobs + 1))
+        {
+            try
             {
                 threads.emplace_front();
+            }
+            catch (...)
+            {
+                /// Most likely this is a std::bad_alloc exception
+                return on_error();
+            }
+
             try
             {
                 threads.front() = Thread([this, it = threads.begin()] { worker(it); });
@@ -126,19 +136,15 @@ ReturnType ThreadPoolImpl<Thread>::scheduleImpl(Job job, int priority, std::opti
             catch (...)
             {
                 threads.pop_front();
-
-                /// Remove the job and return error to caller.
-                /// Note that if we have allocated at least one thread, we may continue
-                /// (one thread is enough to process all jobs).
-                /// But this condition indicate an error nevertheless and better to refuse.
-
-                jobs.pop();
-                --scheduled_jobs;
                 return on_error();
             }
         }
-    }
+
+        jobs.emplace(std::move(job), priority);
+        ++scheduled_jobs;
         new_job_or_shutdown.notify_one();
+    }
+
     return ReturnType(true);
 }
 
@@ -165,6 +171,10 @@ void ThreadPoolImpl<Thread>::wait()
 {
     {
         std::unique_lock lock(mutex);
+        /// Signal here just in case.
+        /// If threads are waiting on condition variables, but there are some jobs in the queue
+        /// then it will prevent us from deadlock.
+        new_job_or_shutdown.notify_all();
         job_finished.wait(lock, [this] { return scheduled_jobs == 0; });
 
         if (first_exception)