thevar1able/ClickHouse
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse.git synced 2024-11-22 15:42:02 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mention async insert

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ramazan Polat 2022-01-07 19:48:01 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent c6b2cd9d14
commit dfe103cdbe
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/en/development/architecture.md
View File

@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ When we are going to read something from a part in `MergeTree`, we look at `prim
When you `INSERT` a bunch of data into `MergeTree`, that bunch is sorted by primary key order and forms a new part. There are background threads that periodically select some parts and merge them into a single sorted part to keep the number of parts relatively low. That’s why it is called `MergeTree`. Of course, merging leads to “write amplification”. All parts are immutable: they are only created and deleted, but not modified. When SELECT is executed, it holds a snapshot of the table (a set of parts). After merging, we also keep old parts for some time to make a recovery after failure easier, so if we see that some merged part is probably broken, we can replace it with its source parts.
`MergeTree` is not an LSM tree because it does not contain “memtable” and “log”: inserted data is written directly to the filesystem. This makes it suitable only to INSERT data in batches, not by individual row and not very frequently – about once per second is ok, but a thousand times a second is not. We did it this way for simplicity’s sake, and because we are already inserting data in batches in our applications.
`MergeTree` is not an LSM tree because it does not contain MEMTABLE and LOG: inserted data is written directly to the filesystem. This behavior makes MergeTree much more suitable to insert data in batches. Therefore frequently inserting small amounts of rows is not ideal for MergeTree. For example, a couple of rows per second is OK, but doing it a thousand times a second is not optimal for MergeTree. However, there is an async insert mode for small inserts to overcome this limitation. We did it this way for simplicity’s sake, and because we are already inserting data in batches in our applications
There are MergeTree engines that are doing additional work during background merges. Examples are `CollapsingMergeTree` and `AggregatingMergeTree`. This could be treated as special support for updates. Keep in mind that these are not real updates because users usually have no control over the time when background merges are executed, and data in a `MergeTree` table is almost always stored in more than one part, not in completely merged form.