Only queries slower then the value of this setting will go to system.query_log,
i.e. something like slow_query_log in mysql.
v2: log_queries_min_time renamed to log_queries_min_query_duration_ms
v3: add current_database into system.query_thread_log
v4: rewrite test using current_database
v5: fix query_duration_ms in system.query_thread_log
Contains error codes with number of times they have been triggered.
Columns:
- `name` ([String](../../sql-reference/data-types/string.md)) — name of the error (`errorCodeToName`).
- `code` ([Int32](../../sql-reference/data-types/int-uint.md)) — code number of the error.
- `value` ([UInt64](../../sql-reference/data-types/int-uint.md)) - number of times this error has been happened.
**Example**
``` sql
SELECT *
FROM system.errors
WHERE value > 0
ORDER BY code ASC
LIMIT 1
┌─name─────────────┬─code─┬─value─┐
│ CANNOT_OPEN_FILE │ 76 │ 1 │
└──────────────────┴──────┴───────┘
MemoryTracker assumes that for VariableContext::Thread new/delete may be
called from different threads, hence the amount of memory can go
negative.
However the MemoryTracker is nested, so even if the negative amount is
allowed for VariableContext::Thread it does not allowed for anything
upper, and hence the MemoryTracking will not be decremented properly.
Fix this, by passing initial size to the parent free.
This should fix memory drift for HTTP queries.
This should significantly reduce the MemoryTracking drift, test shows
that there is 0 drift after query storm (100 queries, via http/tcp/tcp
in one session).
TL;DR;
To track memory, clickhouse creates memory tracker object for each
thread **explicitly**, but until it is not created the memory
allocations are not under account.
There should not be lot of allocations w/o memory tracker, since most of
the time it is created early enough, but even this maybe enough to
trigger some problems.
Plus sometimes it is not possible to create it, for example some 3d
party library does not allow to do this explicitly:
- for example before #15740 allocations from librdkafka threads,
- or even worse, poco threads, they don't have any routines to do this.
This won't be a problem for `MemoryTracking` metric if the deallocation
will be done from the same thread w/o memory tracker (or vise versa),
but this is not always true.
NOTE, that this will slow down per-thread allocations w/o memory
tracker, since before this patch there were no memory tracking for them
while now they will be accounted in total_memory_tracker, and for
total_memory_tracker max_untracked_memory is always reached.
But this should not be significant.
