- The deleted function modelEvaluate() was superseded by
catboostEvaluate().
- Also delete the external model repository, as modelEvaluate() was it's
last user. Additionally remove the system view SYSTEM.MODELS for
inspecting the repository.
- SYSTEM RELOAD MODELS is also obsolete. HOWEVER, it was retained and
made a no-op instead of deleted.
Why?
The reason is that RBAC in distributed setups works by storing
privileges (granted and revoked) as plain SQL statements in Keeper.
Nodes read these statements at startup and parse them. If a privilege
for SYSTEM RELOAD MODELS exists but parser doesn't recognize it
nodes would fail to come up.
Considered but rejected alternatives:
- Ignore SYSTEM RELOAD MODELS during parsing RBAC privileges and
return an error for regular SYSTEM RELOAD MODELS SQL. Special-case
of no-op behavior, too brittle.
- Remove SYSTEM RELOAD MODELS manually from Keeper via command-line
manipulation of Keeper nodes or via SQL by dropping the privileges.
Needs user intervention during upgrade.
This commit moves the catboost model evaluation out of the server
process into the library-bridge binary. This serves two goals: On the
one hand, crashes / memory corruptions of the catboost library no longer
affect the server. On the other hand, we can forbid loading dynamic
libraries in the server (catboost was the last consumer of this
functionality), thus improving security.
SQL syntax:
SELECT
catboostEvaluate('/path/to/model.bin', FEAT_1, ..., FEAT_N) > 0 AS prediction,
ACTION AS target
FROM amazon_train
LIMIT 10
Required configuration:
<catboost_lib_path>/path/to/libcatboostmodel.so</catboost_lib_path>
*** Implementation Details ***
The internal protocol between the server and the library-bridge is
simple:
- HTTP GET on path "/extdict_ping":
A ping, used during the handshake to check if the library-bridge runs.
- HTTP POST on path "extdict_request"
(1) Send a "catboost_GetTreeCount" request from the server to the
bridge, containing a library path (e.g /home/user/libcatboost.so) and
a model path (e.g. /home/user/model.bin). Rirst, this unloads the
catboost library handler associated to the model path (if it was
loaded), then loads the catboost library handler associated to the
model path, then executes GetTreeCount() on the library handler and
finally sends the result back to the server. Step (1) is called once
by the server from FunctionCatBoostEvaluate::getReturnTypeImpl(). The
library path handler is unloaded in the beginning because it contains
state which may no longer be valid if the user runs
catboost("/path/to/model.bin", ...) more than once and if "model.bin"
was updated in between.
(2) Send "catboost_Evaluate" from the server to the bridge, containing
the model path and the features to run the interference on. Step (2)
is called multiple times (once per chunk) by the server from function
FunctionCatBoostEvaluate::executeImpl(). The library handler for the
given model path is expected to be already loaded by Step (1).
Fixes#27870
- In general, it is expected that clickhouse-*-bridges and
clickhouse-server were build from the same source version (e.g. are
upgraded "atomically"). If that is not the case, we should at least
be able to detect the mismatch and abort.
- This commit adds a URL parameter "version", defined in a header shared
by the server and bridges. The bridge returns an error in case of
mismatch.
- The version is *not* send and checked for "ping" requests (used for
handshake), only for regular requests send after handshake. This is
because the internally thrown server-side exception due to HTTP
failure does not propagate the exact HTTP error (it only stores the
error as text), and as a result, the server-side handshake code
simply retries in case of error with exponential backoff and finally
fails with a "timeout error". This is reasonable as pings typically
fail due to time out. However, without a rework of HTTP exceptions,
version mismatch during ping would also appear as "timeout" which is
too misleading. The behavior may be changed later if needed.
- Note that introducing a version parameter does not represent a
protocol upgrade itself. Bridges older than the server will simply
ignore the field. Only servers older than the bridges receive an error
but such a situation should never occur in practice.
