With JOIN from system.clusters one can figure out from which server data
came.
TODO:
- optimization to avoid communicating with unrelated shards (for queries
like "AND _shard_num = n")
- fix aliases (see tests with serverError expected)
v0: AddingConstColumnBlockInputStream
v2: VirtualColumnUtils::rewriteEntityInAst
v3: fix remote(Distributed) by appending _shard_num only if has been requested
Since background flush will not be accounted there, and it can be too
tricky to calclulate this limit, in case you have multiple materialized
views with Buffer engine.
v2: test adjustment
zlib's implementation uses CRC-32-IEEE 802.3 polynomial (0xedb88320) but
with starting value 0xffffffff, so introduce another crc32
implementation - CRC32IEEE that has starting value - 0
Also add CRC64 with ECMA polynomial.
v2: s/crc*_data./crc*_data./ to avoid conflicts with other crc32.h in contrib
v3: join with existing CRC32()
* Fix INSERT into Distributed non local node with MATERIALIZED columns
Previous patch e527def18a ("Fix INSERT
into Distributed() table with MATERIALIZED column") fixes it only for
cases when the node is local, i.e. direct insert.
This patch address the problem when the node is not local
(`is_local == false`), by erasing materialized columns on INSERT into
Distributed.
And this patch fixes two cases, depends on `insert_distributed_sync`
setting:
- `insert_distributed_sync=0`
```
Not found column value in block. There are only columns: date. Stack trace:
2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
3. 0x7fffec5d6cf6 DB::Block::getByName(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:187
4. 0x7fffec2fe067 DB::NativeBlockInputStream::readImpl() dbms/src/DataStreams/NativeBlockInputStream.cpp:159
5. 0x7fffec2d223f DB::IBlockInputStream::read() dbms/src/DataStreams/IBlockInputStream.cpp:61
6. 0x7ffff7c6d40d DB::TCPHandler::receiveData() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:971
7. 0x7ffff7c6cc1d DB::TCPHandler::receivePacket() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:855
8. 0x7ffff7c6a1ef DB::TCPHandler::readDataNext(unsigned long const&, int const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:406
9. 0x7ffff7c6a41b DB::TCPHandler::readData(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:437
10. 0x7ffff7c6a5d9 DB::TCPHandler::processInsertQuery(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:464
11. 0x7ffff7c687b5 DB::TCPHandler::runImpl() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:257
```
- `insert_distributed_sync=1`
```
2019.10.18 13:23:22.114578 [ 44 ] {a78f669f-0b08-4337-abf8-d31e958f6d12} <Error> executeQuery: Code: 171, e.displayText() = DB::Exception: Block structure mismatch in RemoteBlockOutputStream stream: different number of columns:
date Date UInt16(size = 1), value Date UInt16(size = 1)
date Date UInt16(size = 0): Insertion status:
Wrote 1 blocks and 0 rows on shard 0 replica 0, 127.0.0.1:59000 (average 0 ms per block)
Wrote 0 blocks and 0 rows on shard 1 replica 0, 127.0.0.2:59000 (average 2 ms per block)
(version 19.16.1.1) (from [::1]:3624) (in query: INSERT INTO distributed_00952 VALUES ), Stack trace:
2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
3. 0x7fffec5da4e9 DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...)::{...}::operator()(...) const dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:460
4. 0x7fffec5da671 void DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:467
5. 0x7fffec5d8d58 DB::assertBlocksHaveEqualStructure(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:515
6. 0x7fffec326630 DB::RemoteBlockOutputStream::write(DB::Block const&) dbms/src/DataStreams/RemoteBlockOutputStream.cpp:68
7. 0x7fffe98bd154 DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::runWritingJob(DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::JobReplica&, DB::Block const&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const dbms/src/Storages/Distributed/DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp:280
<snip>
````
Fixes: #7365Fixes: #5429
Refs: #6891
* Cover INSERT into Distributed with MATERIALIZED columns and !is_local node
I guess that adding new cluster into server-test.xml is not required,
but it won't harm.
* Update DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp
