When I tried to add cool new clang-tidy 14 warnings, I noticed that the
current clang-tidy settings already produce a ton of warnings. This
commit addresses many of these. Almost all of them were non-critical,
i.e. C vs. C++ style casts.
* Add a warning if parallel_distributed_insert_select was ignored
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Respect max_distributed_depth for parallel_distributed_insert_select
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Print warning for non applied parallel_distributed_insert_select only for initial query
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Remove Cluster::getHashOfAddresses()
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Forbid parallel_distributed_insert_select for remote()/cluster() with different addresses
Before it uses empty cluster name (getClusterName()) which is not
correct, compare all addresses instead.
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Fix max_distributed_depth check
max_distributed_depth=1 must mean not more then one distributed query,
not two, since max_distributed_depth=0 means no limit, and
distribute_depth is 0 for the first query.
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Fix INSERT INTO remote()/cluster() with parallel_distributed_insert_select
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Add a test for parallel_distributed_insert_select with cluster()/remote()
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Return <remote> instead of empty cluster name in Distributed engine
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
* Make user with sharding_key and w/o in remote()/cluster() identical
Before with sharding_key the user was "default", while w/o it it was
empty.
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin <a.khuzhin@semrush.com>
Defines.h is a very common header, so lots of modules will be recompiled
on changes.
Move macros for protocol into separate header, this should significantly
decreases number of units to compile on it's changes.
UBsan reports:
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior ../src/Storages/Distributed/DirectoryMonitor.cpp:435:53 in
../src/Storages/Distributed/DirectoryMonitor.cpp:435: runtime error: 1.15292e+19 is outside the range of representable values of type 'long'
0 0x1df0c286 in DB::StorageDistributedDirectoryMonitor::run() obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../src/Storages/Distributed/DirectoryMonitor.cpp:435:53
It is pretty easy to reproduce by limiting max_server_memory_usage
before staring the test.
- create directory monitors in parallel (this also includes rmdir in
case of directory is empty, since even if the directory is empty it
may take some time to remove it, due to waiting for journal or if the
directory is large, i.e. it had lots of files before, since remember
ext4 does not truncate the directory size on each unlink [1])
- initialize increment in parallel too (since it does readdir())
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/930A5754-5CE6-4567-8CF0-62447C97825C@dilger.ca/
Broken batches may be because of abnormal server shutdown (and lack of
fsync), and ignoring the whole batch is not great in this case, so apply
the same split logic here too.
v2: rename exception
v3: catch missing exception
v4: fix marking the file as broken multiple times (fixes
test_insert_distributed_async_send with setting enabled)
Add distributed_directory_monitor_split_batch_on_failure setting (OFF by
default), that will split the batch and send files one by one in case of
retriable errors.
v2: more error codes
Under use_compact_format_in_distributed_parts_names=1 and
internal_replication=true the server encodes all replicas for the
directory name for async INSERT into Distributed, and the directory name
looks like:
shard1_replica1,shard1_replica2,shard3_replica3
This is required for creating connections (to specific replicas only),
but in case of internal_replication=true, this can be avoided, since
this path will always includes all replicas.
This patch replaces all replicas with "_all_replicas" marker.
Note, that initial problem was that this path may overflow the NAME_MAX
if you will have more then 15 replicas, and the server will fail to
create the directory.
Also note, that changed directory name should not be a problem, since:
- empty directories will be removed since #16729
- and replicas encoded in the directory name is also supported anyway.
