--- slug: /en/guides/developer/transactional --- # Transactional (ACID) support ## Case 1: INSERT into one partition, of one table, of the MergeTree* family This is transactional (ACID) if the inserted rows are packed and inserted as a single block (see Notes): - Atomic: an INSERT succeeds or is rejected as a whole: if a confirmation is sent to the client, then all rows were inserted; if an error is sent to the client, then no rows were inserted. - Consistent: if there are no table constraints violated, then all rows in an INSERT are inserted and the INSERT succeeds; if constraints are violated, then no rows are inserted. - Isolated: concurrent clients observe a consistent snapshot of the table–the state of the table either as it was before the INSERT attempt, or after the successful INSERT; no partial state is seen. Clients inside of another transaction have [snapshot isolation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapshot_isolation), while clients outside of a transaction have [read uncommitted](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolation_(database_systems)#Read_uncommitted) isolation level. - Durable: a successful INSERT is written to the filesystem before answering to the client, on a single replica or multiple replicas (controlled by the `insert_quorum` setting), and ClickHouse can ask the OS to sync the filesystem data on the storage media (controlled by the `fsync_after_insert` setting). - INSERT into multiple tables with one statement is possible if materialized views are involved (the INSERT from the client is to a table which has associate materialized views). ## Case 2: INSERT into multiple partitions, of one table, of the MergeTree* family Same as Case 1 above, with this detail: - If table has many partitions and INSERT covers many partitions, then insertion into every partition is transactional on its own ## Case 3: INSERT into one distributed table of the MergeTree* family Same as Case 1 above, with this detail: - INSERT into Distributed table is not transactional as a whole, while insertion into every shard is transactional ## Case 4: Using a Buffer table - insert into Buffer tables is neither atomic nor isolated nor consistent nor durable ## Case 5: Using async_insert Same as Case 1 above, with this detail: - atomicity is ensured even if `async_insert` is enabled and `wait_for_async_insert` is set to 1 (the default), but if `wait_for_async_insert` is set to 0, then atomicity is not ensured. ## Notes - rows inserted from the client in some data format are packed into a single block when: - the insert format is row-based (like CSV, TSV, Values, JSONEachRow, etc) and the data contains less then `max_insert_block_size` rows (~1 000 000 by default) or less then `min_chunk_bytes_for_parallel_parsing` bytes (10 MB by default) in case of parallel parsing is used (enabled by default) - the insert format is column-based (like Native, Parquet, ORC, etc) and the data contains only one block of data - the size of the inserted block in general may depend on many settings (for example: `max_block_size`, `max_insert_block_size`, `min_insert_block_size_rows`, `min_insert_block_size_bytes`, `preferred_block_size_bytes`, etc) - if the client did not receive an answer from the server, the client does not know if the transaction succeeded, and it can repeat the transaction, using exactly-once insertion properties - ClickHouse is using [MVCC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiversion_concurrency_control) with [snapshot isolation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapshot_isolation) internally for concurrent transactions - all ACID properties are valid even in the case of server kill/crash - either insert_quorum into different AZ or fsync should be enabled to ensure durable inserts in the typical setup - "consistency" in ACID terms does not cover the semantics of distributed systems, see https://jepsen.io/consistency which is controlled by different settings (select_sequential_consistency) - this explanation does not cover a new transactions feature that allow to have full-featured transactions over multiple tables, materialized views, for multiple SELECTs, etc. (see the next section on Transactions, Commit, and Rollback) ## Transactions, Commit, and Rollback In addition to the functionality described at the top of this document, ClickHouse has experimental support for transactions, commits, and rollback functionality. ### Requirements - Deploy ClickHouse Keeper or ZooKeeper to track transactions - Atomic DB only (Default) - Non-Replicated MergeTree table engine only - Enable experimental transaction support by adding this setting in `config.d/transactions.xml`: ```xml 1 ``` ### Notes - This is an experimental feature, and changes should be expected. - If an exception occurs during a transaction, you cannot commit the transaction. This includes all exceptions, including `UNKNOWN_FUNCTION` exceptions caused by typos. - Nested transactions are not supported; finish the current transaction and start a new one instead ### Configuration These examples are with a single node ClickHouse server with ClickHouse Keeper enabled. #### Enable experimental transaction support ```xml title=/etc/clickhouse-server/config.d/transactions.xml 1 ``` #### Basic configuration for a single ClickHouse server node with ClickHouse Keeper enabled :::note See the [deployment](docs/en/deployment-guides/terminology.md) documentation for details on deploying ClickHouse server and a proper quorum of ClickHouse Keeper nodes. The configuration shown here is for experimental purposes. ::: ```xml title=/etc/clickhouse-server/config.d/config.xml debug /var/log/clickhouse-server/clickhouse-server.log /var/log/clickhouse-server/clickhouse-server.err.log 1000M 3 node 1 0.0.0.0 8123 9000 clickhouse-01 9181 9181 1 /var/lib/clickhouse/coordination/log /var/lib/clickhouse/coordination/snapshots 10000 30000 information 1 clickhouse-keeper-01 9234 ``` ### Example #### Verify that experimental transactions are enabled Issue a `BEGIN TRANSACTION` or `START TRANSACTION` followed by a `ROLLBACK` to verify that experimental transactions are enabled, and that ClickHouse Keeper is enabled as it is used to track transactions. ```sql BEGIN TRANSACTION ``` ```response Ok. ``` :::tip If you see the following error, then check your configuration file to make sure that `allow_experimental_transactions` is set to `1` (or any value other than `0` or `false`). ``` Code: 48. DB::Exception: Received from localhost:9000. DB::Exception: Transactions are not supported. (NOT_IMPLEMENTED) ``` You can also check ClickHouse Keeper by issuing ``` echo ruok | nc localhost 9181 ``` ClickHouse Keeper should respond with `imok`. ::: ```sql ROLLBACK ``` ```response Ok. ``` #### Create a table for testing :::tip Creation of tables is not transactional. Run this DDL query outside of a transaction. ::: ```sql CREATE TABLE mergetree_table ( `n` Int64 ) ENGINE = MergeTree ORDER BY n ``` ```response Ok. ``` #### Begin a transaction and insert a row ```sql BEGIN TRANSACTION ``` ```response Ok. ``` ```sql INSERT INTO mergetree_table FORMAT Values (10) ``` ```response Ok. ``` ```sql SELECT * FROM mergetree_table ``` ```response ┌──n─┐ │ 10 │ └────┘ ``` :::note You can query the table from within a transaction and see that the row was inserted even though it has not yet been committed. ::: #### Rollback the transaction, and query the table again Verify that the transaction is rolled back: ```sql ROLLBACK ``` ```response Ok. ``` ```sql SELECT * FROM mergetree_table ``` ```response Ok. 0 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.002 sec. ``` #### Complete a transaction and query the table again ```sql BEGIN TRANSACTION ``` ```response Ok. ``` ```sql INSERT INTO mergetree_table FORMAT Values (42) ``` ```response Ok. ``` ```sql COMMIT ``` ```response Ok. Elapsed: 0.002 sec. ``` ```sql SELECT * FROM mergetree_table ``` ```response ┌──n─┐ │ 42 │ └────┘ ``` ### Transactions introspection You can inspect transactions by querying the `system.transactions` table, but note that you cannot query that table from a session that is in a transaction. Open a second `clickhouse client` session to query that table. ```sql SELECT * FROM system.transactions FORMAT Vertical ``` ```response Row 1: ────── tid: (33,61,'51e60bce-6b82-4732-9e1d-b40705ae9ab8') tid_hash: 11240433987908122467 elapsed: 210.017820947 is_readonly: 1 state: RUNNING ``` ## More Details See this [meta issue](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/48794) to find much more extensive tests and to keep up to date with the progress.