mirror of
https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse.git
synced 2024-12-01 03:52:15 +00:00
83 lines
3.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
83 lines
3.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
AggregatingMergeTree
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
This engine differs from ``MergeTree`` in that the merge combines the states of aggregate functions stored in the table for rows with the same primary key value.
|
|
|
|
In order for this to work, it uses the AggregateFunction data type and the -State and -Merge modifiers for aggregate functions. Let's examine it more closely.
|
|
|
|
There is an AggregateFunction data type, which is a parametric data type. As parameters, the name of the aggregate function is passed, then the types of its arguments.
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: sql
|
|
|
|
CREATE TABLE t
|
|
(
|
|
column1 AggregateFunction(uniq, UInt64),
|
|
column2 AggregateFunction(anyIf, String, UInt8),
|
|
column3 AggregateFunction(quantiles(0.5, 0.9), UInt64)
|
|
) ENGINE = ...
|
|
|
|
This type of column stores the state of an aggregate function.
|
|
|
|
To get this type of value, use aggregate functions with the 'State' suffix.
|
|
Example: uniqState(UserID), quantilesState(0.5, 0.9)(SendTiming) - in contrast to the corresponding 'uniq' and 'quantiles' functions, these functions return the state, rather than the prepared value. In other words, they return an AggregateFunction type value.
|
|
|
|
An AggregateFunction type value can't be output in Pretty formats. In other formats, these types of values are output as implementation-specific binary data. The AggregateFunction type values are not intended for output or saving in a dump.
|
|
|
|
The only useful thing you can do with AggregateFunction type values is combine the states and get a result, which essentially means to finish aggregation. Aggregate functions with the 'Merge' suffix are used for this purpose.
|
|
Example: uniqMerge(UserIDState), where UserIDState has the AggregateFunction type.
|
|
|
|
In other words, an aggregate function with the 'Merge' suffix takes a set of states, combines them, and returns the result.
|
|
As an example, these two queries return the same result:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: sql
|
|
|
|
SELECT uniq(UserID) FROM table
|
|
|
|
SELECT uniqMerge(state) FROM (SELECT uniqState(UserID) AS state FROM table GROUP BY RegionID)
|
|
|
|
There is an AggregatingMergeTree engine. Its job during a merge is to combine the states of aggregate functions from different table rows with the same primary key value.
|
|
|
|
You can't use a normal INSERT to insert a row in a table containing AggregateFunction columns, because you can't explicitly define the AggregateFunction value. Instead, use INSERT SELECT with '-State' aggregate functions for inserting data.
|
|
|
|
With SELECT from an AggregatingMergeTree table, use GROUP BY and aggregate functions with the '-Merge' modifier in order to complete data aggregation.
|
|
|
|
You can use AggregatingMergeTree tables for incremental data aggregation, including for aggregated materialized views.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
Creating a materialized AggregatingMergeTree view that tracks the 'test.visits' table:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: sql
|
|
|
|
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test.basic
|
|
ENGINE = AggregatingMergeTree(StartDate, (CounterID, StartDate), 8192)
|
|
AS SELECT
|
|
CounterID,
|
|
StartDate,
|
|
sumState(Sign) AS Visits,
|
|
uniqState(UserID) AS Users
|
|
FROM test.visits
|
|
GROUP BY CounterID, StartDate;
|
|
|
|
Inserting data in the 'test.visits' table. Data will also be inserted in the view, where it will be aggregated:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: sql
|
|
|
|
INSERT INTO test.visits ...
|
|
|
|
Performing SELECT from the view using GROUP BY to finish data aggregation:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: sql
|
|
|
|
SELECT
|
|
StartDate,
|
|
sumMerge(Visits) AS Visits,
|
|
uniqMerge(Users) AS Users
|
|
FROM test.basic
|
|
GROUP BY StartDate
|
|
ORDER BY StartDate;
|
|
|
|
You can create a materialized view like this and assign a normal view to it that finishes data aggregation.
|
|
|
|
Note that in most cases, using AggregatingMergeTree is not justified, since queries can be run efficiently enough on non-aggregated data.
|