4.4 KiB
slug | sidebar_position | sidebar_label | description | keywords | title | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/en/sql-reference/statements/delete | 36 | DELETE | Lightweight deletes simplify the process of deleting data from the database. |
|
DELETE Statement |
DELETE FROM [db.]table [ON CLUSTER cluster] [WHERE expr]
DELETE FROM
removes rows from the table [db.]table
that match the expression expr
. The deleted rows are marked as deleted immediately and will be automatically filtered out of all subsequent queries. Cleanup of data happens asynchronously in the background. This feature is only available for the MergeTree table engine family.
For example, the following query deletes all rows from the hits
table where the Title
column contains the text hello
:
DELETE FROM hits WHERE Title LIKE '%hello%';
Lightweight deletes are asynchronous by default. Set mutations_sync
equal to 1 to wait for one replica to process the statement, and set mutations_sync
to 2 to wait for all replicas.
:::note
This feature is experimental and requires you to set allow_experimental_lightweight_delete
to true:
SET allow_experimental_lightweight_delete = true;
:::
An alternative way to delete rows in ClickHouse is ALTER TABLE ... DELETE
, which might be more efficient if you do bulk deletes only occasionally and don't need the operation to be applied instantly. In most use cases the new lightweight DELETE FROM
behavior will be considerably faster.
:::warning
Even though deletes are becoming more lightweight in ClickHouse, they should still not be used as aggressively as on an OLTP system. Lightweight deletes are currently efficient for wide parts, but for compact parts, they can be a heavyweight operation, and it may be better to use ALTER TABLE
for some scenarios.
:::
:::note
DELETE FROM
requires the ALTER DELETE
privilege:
grant ALTER DELETE ON db.table to username;
:::
Lightweight Delete Internals
The idea behind Lightweight Delete is that when a DELETE FROM table ...
query is executed ClickHouse only saves a mask where each row is marked as either “existing” or as “deleted”. Those “deleted” rows become invisible for subsequent queries, but physically the rows are removed only later by subsequent merges. Writing this mask is usually much more lightweight than what is done by ALTER table DELETE ...
query.
How it is implemented
The mask is implemented as a hidden _row_exists
system column that stores True for all visible rows and False for deleted ones. This column is only present in a part if some rows in this part were deleted. In other words, the column is not persisted when it has all values equal to True.
SELECT query
When the column is present SELECT ... FROM table WHERE condition
query internally is extended by an additional predicate on _row_exists
and becomes similar to
SELECT ... FROM table PREWHERE _row_exists WHERE condition
At execution time the column _row_exists
is read to figure out which rows are not visible and if there are many deleted rows it can figure out which granules can be fully skipped when reading the rest of the columns.
DELETE query
DELETE FROM table WHERE condition
is translated into ALTER table UPDATE _row_exists = 0 WHERE condition
mutation. Internally this mutation is executed in 2 steps:
SELECT count() FROM table WHERE condition
for each individual part to figure out if the part is affected.- Mutate affected parts, and make hardlinks for unaffected parts. Mutating a part in fact only writes
_row_exists
column and just hardlinks all other columns’ files in the case of Wide parts. But for Compact parts, all columns are rewritten because they all are stored together in one file.
So if we compare Lightweight Delete to ALTER DELETE
in the first step they both do the same thing to figure out which parts are affected, but in the second step ALTER DELETE
does much more work because it reads and rewrites all columns’ files for the affected parts.
With the described implementation now we can see what can negatively affect 'DELETE FROM' execution time:
- Heavy WHERE condition in DELETE query
- Mutations queue filled with other mutations, because all mutations on a table are executed sequentially
- Table having a very large number of data parts
- Having a lot of data in Compact parts—in a Compact part, all columns are stored in one file.
:::note This implementation might change in the future. :::